While I did not have the chance to look into it I noticed your Slide installation displays the ACLs set. How did you configure that?
Oliver On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:41:05 +0200, Thomas Draier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > i finally got something working - it is not yet as complete as the > current build system, but main targets are working, like generating > jars, distributions, documentation, .. i've got 2 main projects, server > and clients, each of one separated in multiple small subprojects. i did > not include yet projector, wck, and the testsuite module. the jars are > not included within the projects, as they should be on a separate > repository. most of them are available on the standard maven repository > and will be downloaded automatically, but some are not available for > release or licensing issue, so you'll need to install all those jars > manually. i may also be able to give you access to my maven repository, > so that downloads will be managed by maven. i'll check if it's > possible, that will be much easier as you will just need to type a > single command to download everything and make the distrib. anyway, if > you want to a have a first look at the whole thing, i've bundled all > the project in a tgz file available at > http://www.codeva.net/jahia/webdav/users/root/public/maven.tgz (on a > slide repository, of course ;-) > thomas > > Le 19 oct. 04, � 17:27, James Mason a �crit : > > > > > Well, it can't hurt to look, and if you're offering to do the work ;). > > Once you have something done we can all evaluate it and then put it to > > a > > vote. > > > > -James > > > > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 03:53, Thomas Draier wrote: > >> hi james, > >> if you're interested i would be happy to try to make the base > >> structure > >> and project files for the different slide subprojects - i agree that > >> all developers still have to download and install maven, and that it's > >> real turn off, but it is more or less as simple as ant to install and > >> imho the benefits are so huge you quickly become addict :-) > >> thomas > >> > >> Le 18 oct. 04, � 18:03, James Mason a �crit : > >> > >>> Thomas, > >>> > >>> I need to spend some time playing with maven before I could support > >>> moving to it. I really like ant, so if maven enhances what ant brings > >>> I'm all for that. However, as a developer who's never had maven > >>> installed it's been a real turn-off for me to come across a project > >>> that > >>> requires me to download and setup a whole new environment just to > >>> build > >>> their code. > >>> > >>> If maven is simple enough to setup and integrates well enough with > >>> the > >>> existing development environments of the committers/contributors to > >>> Slide, then changing build systems is a possibility. > >>> > >>> -James > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:47, Thomas Draier wrote: > >>>> hi, > >>>> i still have 2 patches waiting in the bugzilla , 31196 & 31265 , > >>>> can > >>>> anybody have a look at it before changing the structure ? > >>>> restructuration of the cvs would be great - and that also would be > >>>> very > >>>> nice to use maven to make the builds, as it completely clarifies > >>>> dependencies with other modules, that is very helpful when > >>>> integrating > >>>> in other projects, and it gives a "standard" file organization for > >>>> all > >>>> the project files. maven is replacing ant in more and more projects > >>>> and > >>>> i believe that would be the good time to integrate it into slide, > >>>> what > >>>> do you think ? > >>>> thomas > >>>> > >>>> Le 18 oct. 04, � 09:24, Oliver Zeigermann a �crit : > >>>> > >>>>> +1 to all this. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think we could begin restructuring the CVS HEAD soon - just make > >>>>> sure everyone committed their patches before - and have it avaiable > >>>>> for general release in 2.2 > >>>>> > >>>>> Oliver > >>>>> > >>>>> James Mason schrieb: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Big +1 from me. Your thread in the PMC actually got me thinking > >>>>>> along > >>>>>> similar lines. I'd like to take it a little further than just > >>>>>> separate > >>>>>> release cycles, though. > >>>>>> Currently the Slide project is structured something like: > >>>>>> +- Slide Server > >>>>>> \ > >>>>>> +- Slide Client > >>>>>> +- Proposals > >>>>>> +- Everything else (etc) > >>>>>> which means everything is effectively a child of the server. I'd > >>>>>> like > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> make the Server a sibling of everything else rather than being the > >>>>>> parent. I think this better reflects the current state of the > >>>>>> project, > >>>>>> gives more prominence to the other components, and will make > >>>>>> builds > >>>>>> easier to manage. > >>>>>> I'd like to see this structure reflected in both cvs and the > >>>>>> documentation/website. I think the former will make builds/release > >>>>>> easier and the latter will make it easier for people to find what > >>>>>> they're looking for (as well as giving more prominence to the > >>>>>> other > >>>>>> components). > >>>>>> I think this kind of separation would also provide a good gauge of > >>>>>> whether Slide could stand on its own as a TLP. At this point I > >>>>>> don't > >>>>>> think we could (nor do we need to), but if we can organize the > >>>>>> complexity we currently have and make it clear how current and > >>>>>> future > >>>>>> components fit under the Slide umbrella I think we'll be mostly > >>>>>> ready > >>>>>> if/when there is enough external interest in Slide to warrant a > >>>>>> TLP. > >>>>>> -James > >>>>>> On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 22:35, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > >>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Slide has become a large project with lots of components. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> After some experience with the testsuite which until 2.1b2 has > >>>>>>> not > >>>>>>> been released at all and the projector which did not make it into > >>>>>>> the 2.1b2, but seems to be almost ready for prime time, it might > >>>>>>> be > >>>>>>> a good idea to release at least these components in a decoupled > >>>>>>> release process: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - projector: WebDAV workflow and rendering > >>>>>>> - testsuite: most complete WebDAV testsuite > >>>>>>> - wck: simple WebDAV enabling kit for enterprise / business > >>>>>>> systems > >>>>>>> of all kinds > >>>>>>> - WebDAV client library (maybe along with ant tasks and > >>>>>>> connector) > >>>>>>> - WebDAV command line cient > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I only recently understood this is possible without any problem > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>> would make the release cycle - which is HUGE for Slide because of > >>>>>>> its complexity - much shorter. We still could have a general and > >>>>>>> a > >>>>>>> bundled release once in a while. But projector could release > >>>>>>> earlier > >>>>>>> than the general Slide 2.2 which can not be expected before 2005. > >>>>>>> Same thing with WCK, it is at least ready for a beta, but of > >>>>>>> course > >>>>>>> can not be part of the 2.1 release, so it would have to wait > >>>>>>> until > >>>>>>> 2005 as well. I have big expectations in WCK concerning a boost > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>> publicity for Slide... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Additionally, the server and client parts may have different > >>>>>>> development speeds, and might be release asynchronously, which is > >>>>>>> fine as they communicate over WebDAV (2.1 has been an exception > >>>>>>> as > >>>>>>> new methods have been added). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We would need additional release managers for each component > >>>>>>> then. > >>>>>>> This could all be James, but that would be unfair I guess. So, I > >>>>>>> would propose Daniel for the projector, Stefan for the testsuite, > >>>>>>> myself for wck, and Ingo for the client parts. James would remain > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>> be the general release manager. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Of course all this would be on a volunteer base and if there is > >>>>>>> no > >>>>>>> release manager for each sub component obviously there is no > >>>>>>> interest for a dedicated release. For now I can only signal my > >>>>>>> willingness to do this for WCK. I am pretty sure Daniel would for > >>>>>>> projector. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Comments? Does this make sense? Do you people want this as well? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Oliver > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> - > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> -- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> - > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
