A great, thanks for finding out :) As you do not have CVS commit access, yet, I will add it for you...
Oliver On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:46:55 +0100, Thomas Draier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > i finally found how that works .. a special variable is set when is a > lock response is received. here's the working test case. > thomas > > > > > Le 10 nov. 04, � 18:34, Oliver Zeigermann a �crit : > > > I see. Is this what the Mac actually does? Adding the token to the > > method headers? > > > > I am nor very familiar with the testsuite either, but I am sure this > > is possible. I will try and find out how... > > > > Oliver > > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:58:21 +0100, Thomas Draier > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i'm not really used to the testsuite system, but it looks like the put > >> doesn't succeed because of the lock. the header > >> If:(<opaquelocktoken:xxx>) should be added to the put and > >> Lock-Token:<opaquelocktoken:xxx> to the unlock commands, but i don't > >> know if it's possible to define variables in the test case to store > >> the > >> lock token. > >> thomas > >> > >> Le 10 nov. 04, � 08:36, Oliver Zeigermann a �crit : > >> > >> > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> so does the test case succeed with Slide? I was wondering about the > >>> lock/unlock stuff not passing any lock token.., > >>> > >>> Oliver > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:45:06 +0100, Thomas Draier > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> hi, > >>>> here's the modified test case - i've just added a few gets and > >>>> propfinds around the put, and changed some response codes from 200 > >>>> to > >>>> 204. hope that works. > >>>> thomas > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le 9 nov. 04, � 17:04, Oliver Zeigermann a �crit : > >>>> > >>>>>> Thomas, could you - please, I know it is dull work - resend the > >>>>>> trace > >>>>>> for me to complete the test case? This is important for future > >>>>>> problems with the Mac! > >>>>> > >>>>> It might even be easier if you completed the test case - both for > >>>>> you > >>>>> and me. The XML syntax is very simple and it should be no problem > >>>>> to > >>>>> understand what is going on. I guess we will need just a few > >>>>> additions... > >>>>> > >>>>> Oliver > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> -- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> - > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
