Hi Stefan, this is very good news! I've had a look at the PropertyHelper some time ago and there is some space for improvements ;-) Cheers, Daniel
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:slide-dev-return-14998-apmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Stefan L�tzkendorf > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2004 10:35 > An: Slide Developers Mailing List > Betreff: Re: [POLL] 2.2 release time frame > > James Mason wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 19:06 +0100, Stefan L�tzkendorf wrote: > > > >>The lucene indexing is almost ready. (I'm looking for a solution for > >>large modifications which require a lot of reindexing, but thats not a > >>new feature). > >> > >>I plan to restructure the "computed property" computing mechanics to > >>allow userdefined computed properties (e.g. inherited properties). > > > > > > Can you elaborate on "computed properties"? A link to the mailing list > > archives or commit logs would be enough. I'm just curious because it > > might help with something I've been toying with. > > Currently in the PropertyHelper exists a method computeProperty which is > used to evaluate properties that are derived from the repository state > and other properties. > This is currently a hardcoded long if-ifelse... structure. > I plan to introduce a dynamic structure. An object for each property > .... This would allow dynamic addition of computed properties. > > Ragards Stefan > > > > > -James > > > > > >>I have a first version for automated testsuite runs that allow to test a > >>number of configurations automatically. I plan to check in this ASAP. > >> > >>Two testcases regarding locks are currently failing. > >> > >>Nevertheless, I would welcome a shorter release cycle, so from my side > >>there is no stopper for a next release. The second point can wait until > 2.3. > >> > >>Regards, Stefan > >> > >> > >>Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Folks, > >>> > >>>I am a bit concerned about the duration of our release cycles. E.g. > >>>some contributions in 2.1 are much older than half a year before they > >>>are even released as stable. > >>> > >>>Apache rule is to release early and often. > >>> > >>>My proposal is to speed up the cycle for 2.2 and subsequent releases > >>>and put less new stuff into each of them. My impression is that 2.2 > >>>almost has got enough new features to justify a new release. > >>> > >>>What do you think? What do you want to add and when? What is in your > >>>pipeline for 2.2? Mine is empty... > >>> > >>>Oliver > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
