I see no big issues. If any become obvious later, of course a 2.1.1 will be an option. I will start the vote for the 2.1 final...
Oliver On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:46:27 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me, unless there are any big issues hanging around. > > To be honest, I don't mind releasing a 2.1.1 the beginning of January if > we need to. > > -James > > > > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 22:52 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > Subject says it all... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Oliver > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
