On the one hand I can see the need to be compliant whenever and wherever we can. On the other hand a property by any other name will smell as sweet, or to put it differently, why do we need specific support for a comment? Does not PROPPATCH AND PROPFIND work?
Michael Oliver CTO Alarius Systems LLC 6800 E. Lake Mead Blvd, #1096 Las Vegas, NV 89156 Phone:(702)866-9034 Cell:(518)378-6154 Fax:(702)974-0341 -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:50 AM To: slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: What's up with DAV:comment? If i understand http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3253.txt, than DAV:comment could be used to set a comment to a resource. For the current project i am working on, i need the possibility to add a comment to a resource which should be PUT to the server. The problem is that i couldn't find any implementation for DAV:comment on both sides, server and client. Is this solved different for slide or is there no requirement for this property? Regards, Matthias Wolf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
