> Hi,
>
> I am trying to move some resources via webdav. Usually it works very well
> but once in a while there occurs an error as in the message sequence
below.
> It looks as if the 423 Locked response refers to the fact that the source
> could not be removed, because afterwards both the source resource and the
> destination resource are on the server, just as if a copy had been done.
Yet
> I never requested a lock for the source resource. Also, in the admin app
if
> I try to remove the locks, they are not removed. I have to wait for them
to
> timeout.So my question is where does this lock come from, and why does
this
> error occur. Do you think this could be a bug in the webdav servlet ?

So in your case /files/pages/home2/clients/page.xhp is not locked at all ?
You mentioned the admin webapp. Does it display any locks on that resource ?
Did you try to kill that lock ?

That is really strange overall, as none of the WebDAV methods will put a
WebDAV lock automatically (that would violate the spec); so I don't see how
a lock can spontaneously appear. Note that some WebDAV editors could lock a
resource, and then forget to unlock it.

Remy

> sincerely,
> Unico Hommes
>
> Request message :
>
> header :
>
> Destination: xxx
> content-type:text/xml
>
> body :
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <A:propertybehavior xmlns:A="DAV:">
> <A:keepalive>*</A:keepalive>
> </A:propertybehavior>
>
> Response message :
>
> header :
>
> Content-Type: text/html
> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 15:48:47 GMT
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> Server: Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 (HTTP/1.1 Connector)
>
> body :
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
> <d:multistatus xmlns:d="DAV:">
> <d:response>
> <d:href>/files/pages/home2/clients/page.xhp</d:href>
> <d:status>HTTP/1.1 423 Locked</d:status>
> </d:response>
> </d:multistatus>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to