"Pill, Juergen" wrote: > Hello Bita, > > You may want to have a look at some of the test cases (the headers part > contains the http header, the body the http body, in the example physically > located in a file). The test suite uses variables enclosed in %...% > > <request> > <command > varUsage="globalVariableCollection,globalVariableServerName">PUT > /%globalVariableServerName%/%globalVariableCollection%/help-doc.html > HTTP/1.1</command> > <header>Accept-Language: en-us</header> > <header>Translate: f</header> > <header>User-Agent: Microsoft Data Access Internet Publishing > Provider DAV</header> > <header>Connection: Keep-Alive</header> > <body fileReference="../../../contentDirectory/html.html"> > </body> > </request>
Thanks. Could you please address me more to understand the format. I mean just reference me some documents so that I can get more about. > > > > This functional request would require, that the execution of further steps > depends on the response code, or even the value of the XML response > document. I would consider this a second extension step. Would this be > crucial for your work? Additionally variable would be helpful (in a > second/third) step, consider following batch sequence: lock, put, unlock. > The lock token from the first lock command need to be transferred to the put > and unlock command. This is very wise point you are mentioning, however in my project the current method doesn't effect on the permission of the rest. For example, it is deleting 100 files or batch sequence of Mkcol and Proppatch. And it is important to me that either all methods handle or none of them. > > > Best regards > > Juergen Thanks, Bita. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
