Hi Folks, > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: James Higginbotham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 14. M�rz 2003 00:49 > An: Slide Users Mailing List > Betreff: RE: newbie question about slide future > > This is interesting.. I have never understood the relationship of the > Jakarta group wrt resources. If I'm hearing that someone or some group > within the Jakarta group has pulled off assigned commiters to work on > another project, then some underlying initiative would have to be > greater than permanently assigned resources to a specific project. Is > this correct? I'm mostly familiar with things like Struts, > Commons, and > Tomcat where you see the same names all the time. So what's different > about Slide? Just trying to understand why Slide has become a > wasteland > from the core commiters recently in leau of "other things". > > Thanks, > James
I agree with what James said. How Jakarta constribution works is not clear to me, too. As James said I would like to know who the users can breath in the project new life by commint docs and code into cvs. Let's get the slepper awaken. :-) Bye Toby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
