I believe that the jdbc store does not operate on a relative database design however there is some rdbmsJDBC somewhere! The j2eestore is using a relational database design, and is based on the XADatasourse and is thereby multithreaded while the JDBC connection is singelthreaded.
My tests are showing nice results with 500.000+ files with slide and SQLserver on one machine! The limitation on the number of concurrent users is increased by the j2ee store! I am working on putting some on the standard Meta tag into a separate table and thereby avoiding a really large properties table! As I see it the JDBC store should not bee used in any kind of production environment! /Jacob -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11. juni 2003 03:46 To: Slide Users Mailing List Subject: Re: J2EE Store vs JDBC Store Hi, Can someone please weigh in on this subject? I'd like to know too. Currently I'm using the JDBC store. But I'd be interested in knowing if the J2EE stores are more appropriate if one is using Slide within an EJB. TIA, -kevin --- Doug Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone explain the difference between using a > JDBC Store and a J2EE Store? Under which situations > would it be ideal to use a J2EE Store vs a JDBC > Store? What are the pros and cons of each type of > store? I am mainly interested in using Slide for > content management/versioning. > > -doug > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
