Could you send the attachement ? On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 19:08, Willie Vu wrote: > Attached are J2EEManagedStore and J2EEManagedDescriptorsStore. They are done > based on J2EEStore. and J2EEDescriptorsStore. > > These 2 classes make use of a DataSource object obtained from J2EE container. > It relinquishes transaction control to J2EE container so that CMT or BMT EJBs > can make use of them. > > Disclaimer: You can make use of the classes as is. Please let me know if you > have any problems/comments with them. > > -- > Willie Vu > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jacob Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:27 > > To: 'Slide Users Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: Transactions in Slide? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I hope that you will put your effort into the store committed > > by Ashok! This j2ee store is based on a relational db and has > > some really nice performance improvements. > > > > Ashok's last commitment was posted on this list on February 3 2003! > > > > I will be happy to participate further if you choose to > > follow that line! > > > > Thanks, > > Jacob > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 15. juni 2003 01:18 > > To: Slide Users Mailing List > > Subject: RE: Transactions in Slide? > > > > > > Hi Willie, > > Thank you very much for responding. Yes, the lack > > of feedback is frustrating. What you described in > > your note makes sense to me. Is J2EEManagedStore > > something you would consider posting to the mailing > > list? If not, can you please clarify what you had to > > do to create it? Obviously I don't want the store to > > do commits or rollbacks on the java.sql.Connection. > > But I also have to modify how the DataSource is looked > > up, right? J2EEStore wants to look up the DataSource > > under java:/comp/env; JBoss binds it under java:/. Is > > there anything else I should be aware of? > > > > Thanks again for your help. > > -kevin > > > > P.S. I'm probably misunderstanding your point about > > webapps. But can't I sidestep the issue by having > > slide.war include a Domain.xml that uses the standard > > J2EE stores and have my EJBs load a different > > Domain.xml that uses, say, J2EEManagedStore? Wouldn't > > that work? That way I wouldn't have to manage the > > transactions myself. > > > > --- Willie Vu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > > > So many questions left unanswered. It is > > > unfortunate we are left alone in the > > > dark. > > > > > > In the end, I have to do what I suggested. I > > > created a J2EEManagedStore that > > > relinquishes transaction control to J2EE container. > > > It just accepts a data > > > source object and makes connections. It relies on > > > the J2EE Container to take > > > care of the transaction stuff. It works both for > > > CMP and BMP entity beans. > > > > > > One downside though is when this store is used from > > > a webapp. UserTransaction > > > has to be managed programmatically. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Willie Vu > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
