Quoting Jim Tivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi folks
> 
> Why is slide not good for hooking up repositories.  Isn't this what Tamino
> did with slide V1.x?  How many other databases/interfaces have used slide
> for providing WebDav - JDBC to name one?
> 

AFAIK, Tamino stores and indexes XML, so Slide uses Tamino as a 'Store', and 
implements a store class to talk to it. For pure storage, any repository can 
be tied into slide without too much hassle.
What's much harder is integrating a full repository, which has its own 
notions of users, permissions, versions, etc, things that slide usally 
handles.

> As well, isn't it a big mistake to tie the user storage into slide - what
> about single signon functionality where you rely on a directory or
> authentication server to authenticate users.
> 

I agree with you here.

> Having slide store permissions is probably OK although it should be
> abstracted if possible.
> 
> I am interested because we too have looked at slide although we currently
> have our own WebDav client.
> 
> cheers
> Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Unger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:35 AM
> > To: Slide Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Is Slide the best choice ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Slide may not be your best choice, it depends.
> >
> > Slide is mainly a content repository, ie slide stores and loads
> > the content,
> > and takes care of versioning and searching etc... From the sounds
> > of things,
> > however, it sounds like you already have the repository, and only want 
to
> > provide webdav access to the existing repository. In this case
> > using slide
> > might be trcky, since presumably you would have to write a store class 
to
> > interface with your existing repository. You'd pretty soon run
> > into issues
> > with users and permissions, since slide expects to store these.
> >
> > It might be easier to use a more simple webdav server, such as the one
> > bundled with Tomcat. I don't know if this webdav server expects to read/
> > write directly from the file system, but assuming it operates on
> > the Tomcat
> > Resource level, all you would have to do is implement a JNDI
> > DirContext to
> > provide read/write access to your existing repository, and you'd have a
> > solution...
> >
> >
> > Richie
> >
> >
> >
> > Quoting Flavio Eduardo de Cordova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > People...
> > >
> > >   I started studying Slide some weeks ago but I have some
> > questions and I
> > hope
> > > you can help me...
> > >
> > >   First, my goal is to create a WebDAV layer to an ECM System (ECM =
> > > Enterprise Content Management) that has all the information about 
users,
> > > permissions, structure, documents and content. When the user
> > connects to
> > this
> > > layer he must see only the folders/documents he's allowed, exactly 
like
> > when
> > > he/she uses the system's web version.
> > >
> > >   So, my first question is: Slide has some default folders in the root
> > > (/actions, /files, etc) that I don't want to show to the users. Since
> > those
> > > folders are configured in the domain.xml could I remove these
> > entries and
> > use
> > > a new one (for the root) that would get this information from my ECM
> > system
> > > (for example: <objectnode classname="org.acme.MyNewNodeType"
> > uri="/" />) ?
> > I
> > > know they are important to make slide work properly but considering 
I'm
> > going
> > > to use custom classes should I be concerned ?
> > >   If not, how do I do this ? Have somebody used slide to do
> > something like
> > > this before ?
> > >
> > >   I'm not convinced yet if Slide is the best choice to help
> > me on this
> > since
> > > it looks like I'll have to rewrite a lot of classes... Or maybe
> > it's not
> > so
> > > many but I feel like I'm buying a whole car just to get a new
> > tire. All I
> > > need is somebody to handle the WebDAV protocol..
> > >
> > >   Do you think I should be trying to use any other component
> > or API ? Or
> > Slide
> > > is actually the best choice ? Have somebody already done this ?
> > >
> > > Flavio Eduardo de C�rdova
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > This mail sent through the
> > ungerground webmail system
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------
This mail sent through the 
ungerground webmail system

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to