How is DAV:principal added to DAV:resourcetype? Users added in the domain.xml file are fine, but if I create a user using mkcol and proppatch, then the DAV:principal is missing.
I believe slide does not allow users to be placed in collections - should all collections in the userspath be principals or do collections make sense in the userspath? Is there a way to create users using the webdav interface? I know it is not a part of the standard, but it was possible before! /Jacob -----Original Message----- From: Nevermann, Dr., Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. januar 2004 22:49 To: Slide Users Mailing List Subject: RE: group-membership and latest slide OK, the fixes are checked-in now. Regards, Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Nevermann, Dr., Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 19:42 > To: Slide Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: group-membership and latest slide > > > > From: Jacob Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 12:03 > > > > I was looking at the latest ACL implementation and I have > > some problems with > > DAV:group-membership. On a principal uri this property should > > contain the > > groups in which a user is a member of. (Referring to section > > 4.4 in the ACL > > draft 12). > > OK, that's a bug - thanks for reporting. I fixed it but will > check-in on Monday, because I hadn't time to run the > testsuite yet. Also, DAV:principal was missing in > DAV:resourcetype of principal resources. > > > I am not sure about this because we are talking about groups > > and not roles. > > I am using the default domain.xml for testing - I tried to > convert the > > default roles to groups, but that did not change anything. > When I do a > > propfind on a user uri for DAV:group-membership, then I get a > > 404 response. > > The ACL standard only has one notion of a grouping principal, > being a principal which can contain other principals. You > might have noticed that in the Slide impl there is a > groupsPath and a rolesPath (we needed both for Tamino). I > suggest that we use the term "role" in Slide, as it is closer > to Tomcat and what we had before in Slide. So, you might > ignore "groups" (do not define groupsPath in Domain.xml) and > let a role be the type principal which can contains other > principals (users or roles). > > Regards, > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
