Why the current Slide API is not appropriate for this kind of integration ? If my web application requires no such much documents, why not use the Slide API from this web application ?
What is the plan for WVCM in the Slide project ? It this proposal is almost finish ? Same question for the JCR 170 ? What is its status ? Are there not some common features between both JCR ?
Christophe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you want give WVCM (JSR-147) a try? You can find a kind of reference impl in Slide's CVS at proposals/wvcm.
Regards, Peter
-----Original Message----- From: Chamberlain James O. CONTR J9C998 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 19:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Portal integration with Slide
I m currently working on a project to integrate Slide into our portal as
a JSR-168 compliant portlet. I have a first rev with minimal
functionality (browsing, uploading, deleting, and locking), but no acl
or versioning support. Today it is using the Slide client API which
forces it to know the user's username and password. I am uncomfortable
with this solution and feel that it will get shot down in my environment
because of this. What other options are available for integrating with
Slide where it can share the user's principal? Is using the Slide API
the right answer?
Any recommendations or ideas would be appreciated.
Regards,
James
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
