I'm planning on it being in 2.1. I updated my system last night and there's a bug in MySQL in the latest debian unstable, so I'm having trouble with testing :). It's close to finished, though, so I expect to commit the code later this week.

-James

Warwick Burrows wrote:

James, thanks for the details on clustering.

The version of clustering that you're working on is a far better solution
than turning off caching on the servers. Will your modifications make it
into the 2.1 beta version?  I really hope so as I don't think our product
will get the performance numbers we need with uncached servers :-/

Thanks,
Warwick


-----Original Message-----
From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:50 PM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Cache refresh notification in two different instance of Slide
running on different boxes.



Comments below.

Warwick Burrows wrote:


Daniel,

I'm a little confused by this question. Why wouldn't you use Slide clustering but still synchronize the caches of the two servers? Are there features of Slide clusters that you don't want?

James,

What is the Slide clustering design? I remember a note where you said that load-balancing is not a function of Slide clustering but that cache consistency between servers is.


When I say load-balancing isn't something Slide handles, I mean with a cluster of Slide servers something else (a load-balancer) must decide which requests go to which Slide server. Slide can't, and I think shouldn't, pass requests to other servers in a cluster.


So what other features make up Slide's clustering implementation?


Slide currently supports "clustering" by pointing all your Slide instances at the same Store, then disabling the global cache of each Slide instance. This works, but without the global cache there is a noticeable slowdown in the amount of time each transaction takes. What I'm working on is a way to keep the global cache enabled and inform the other servers in a cluster that their cache needs to be updated when a resource changes.


And what is the underlying network transport for
the cache update notification events that are sent between the servers?


The first implementation will use JMS, mainly because I've used it before and I'm wanting to get this done before the feature freeze for 2.1. The ultimate goal is to use WebDAV notifications to send events between servers. Unfortunately Slide doesn't support persistent subscriptions for notifications yet, so it's not quite ready for this. An acceptable alternative would be JGroups, but I've never used it before, and as I said, I'm in a bit of a hurry :).

-James



Warwick


----------------------------------------------------------- Warwick Burrows E2open Senior Engineer 9600 Great Hills Trail, #325 http://www.e2open.com Austin TX 78759 -----------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message----- From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:50 AM To: Slide Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Cache refresh notification in two different instance of Slide running on different boxes.


Daniel Varghese wrote:


Hello James,

thnx for your valuable information abt Slide Clustering and Cache
refresh notifications among the cluster nodes couple of days back.


You're welcome.



Now I have another question.

Two instance of Slide running on two different Unix boxes and I'm not
planing to use Cluster, In this senario how do we notify the cache information between different server instances.


You don't yet. Hopefully I'll be able to submit the code that does this
tonight. I upgraded my desktop yesterday evening and there's a bug in the mysql update I got, so I haven't been able to test it yet.


-James



Cluster Configuration is a must for cache refresh notification ?

rgds
Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to