Hi, Carlos! > I haven't tested it, but why is not possible to use both? I haven't tested this either. Probably you could create groups as well as roles but can't use both for authentication/authorization... Well, I'm just guessing, probably the org.apache.slide.security.ACLSecurityImpl class can provide more insight into the matter...
> > The reason I asked is because we need a feature present in > some CMS or PDM systems in which users take a role on login. > For the duration of that session the user only belongs to > that one role. So I was thinking that groups could be used > for static groupings and roles for this type of dynamic > grouping. As far as configuration, a user belongs to one or > more groups and one or more roles. But the list of roles are > only the list of allowed roles, only one (or maybe a set) is > taken on a particular session. I see. Couldn't you use different "types" of roles if groups and roles really can't be used together? Yours sincerely, Andrey. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
