Ok. I thought that updating the tree would be enough to pick those extra
branches up but it wasn't :-)  I finally stumbled upon the way to do it and
added the extra labels to my choices.

So given that, where should I be picking up 2.1 bug fixes? From the
SLIDE_2_1_RELEASE_BRANCH or from the HEAD? I compared the two and the HEAD
has the latest rev numbers (obviously) and some changes that aren't in the
SLIDE_2_1_RELEASE_BRANCH. I saw a bug fix to the DB2 adapter in there for
instance. So is the HEAD the one to pull updates from?

Thanks,
Warwick



-----Original Message-----
From: Warwick Burrows 
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:52 AM
To: 'Slide Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: CVS label for the Slide 2.1 beta?



James, I'm using the eclipse CVS client (v2.1.1 it seems) and it doesn't
show either of these branches or labels. I'm connecting with
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic. The only branches it lists
are: 

        SLIDE_1_0
        SLIDE_2_0_RELEASE_BRANCH 
        SLIDE_2_1_EXTERNAL_TX

There are more "versions" listed - which may correspond to labels - but the
latest for 2.1 is SLIDE_2_1_M1_RELEASE.  Why am I not seeing these other
branches??

Thanks,
Warwick



-----------------------------------------------------------
 Warwick Burrows              E2open
 Senior Engineer              9600 Great Hills Trail, #325
 http://www.e2open.com        Austin TX 78759
-----------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:30 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: CVS label for the Slide 2.1 beta?


Warwick,

We're working off the SLIDE_2_1_RELEASE_BRANCH. There's also a 
SLIDE_2_1_BETA1_RELEASE version, if you want a snapshot.

If you're using Eclipse be sure to update your branches and version to 
get the latest ones. There's instructions on the Slide site for doing 
this if you've forgotten how (I know I have several times).

-James

Warwick Burrows wrote:
>  
> What's the label in CVS that signifies the 2.1 beta release?  I don't 
> see one in there that stands out.
>  
> Thanks,
> Warwick
>  
> 
> <http://www.e2open.com/>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> Warwick Burrows
> Senior Software Engineer
> 
>       
> 
>  
> 
>       
> 
> *Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Fax:   *512.343.8727
> 
>       
> 
>  
> 
>       
> 
> 9600 Great Hills Trail, #325
> Austin, TX  78759
> http://www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
>  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to