I see, thanks for the info. Yours sincerely, Andrey.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Slide Users Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Using the slide api directly vs. using the webdav client > > I haven't measured the performance difference, but I have put > timer logs and the http overhead is less than 100 ms while > slide api calls take anywhere from 0.5 seconds to almost a > minute (large collections, report method and other nasty > stuff) based on the request. Please don't hear me say that > http is zero overhead. The overhead is negligible compared to > the overal execution time. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrey Shulinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Slide Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 7:12 PM > Subject: RE: Using the slide api directly vs. using the webdav client > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Slide Users Mailing List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 6:50 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Using the slide api directly vs. using the > webdav client > > > > > > I don't think performance is going to be the issue here. If > > > your client and server are on the same machine, the overhead > > > of http will be minimal. The big advantage that outweighs > > > > Actually, I've heard two quite opposite opinions. I wonder > if somebody > has > > actually measured this difference somehow... :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
