Except for the Realm Slide does not rely on Tomcat at all. Anyway, both
native Tomcat and JAAS authentication seem to work fine with Tomcat 4,
so I see no need for worries here...
Oliver
Warwick Burrows schrieb:
I know that I would like to continue to use Slide with the reliable 4.1.x
version but I don't use the 4.1.x binary distribution anyway. But a shift
away from tomcat 4.1 x in the actual code base would be more of a concern to
me. You're not suggesting this though are you?
Thanks,
Warwick
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:26 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: JAASRealm classloder problem with Tomcat 5 (not 4)
No. The reason was Tomcat 5 was pretty new at the time of the 2.0
release and people were asking to have the "reliable" 4
version as well.
I can see no more reasons to stick to 4 anymore. Except: We
already had
the 2.1 with the Tomcat 4 distribution. However, if anyone has to fo
with Tomcat 4 he/she can still patch it with the ant tasks.
Oliver
Unico Hommes schrieb:
I don't use the tomcat bundles but to me it makes perfect sense to
have
only one out-of-the box distribution. What was the reason
for having
both in the first place? Was it this JAASRealm issue? In
that case even
more reason to drop tomcat 4 bundle.
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Isn't it about time do drop the Tomcat 4 bundle as a distribution
along with that?
Oliver
Unico Hommes schrieb:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I mentioned before that in Tomcat 5 there was the old silly
classloader problem with the JAASRealm we had with the ordinary
SlideRealm before. So I decided to stick to the
SlideRealm. I have,
however, found out what the problem was
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29406
and it obviously has been fixed in 5.0.28. You just have
to change
the configuration in server.xml and add something like
useContextClassLoader="false"
to your JAAS ream defintion and things work from a single war.
What about changing the default Tomcat bundle to this setting?
Maybe
even for the 2.1 release?
I'd say go for it :-)
--
Unico
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
