I think it sould work. If you create the required nodes in store s1
(i.e. /a, /a/deeper and /a/deeper/path).
It is simply a (lesser usefull) version of the very usefull version
like:
<scope match="/" store="s1">
<scope match="/docs" store="s2">
<scope match="/users" store="s3">
May be the following method at the Namespace class could answer
whether we could use the MacroStore interface:
(I have not tried it out )
public boolean canUseMacroStore(Uri source, Uri destination) {
if (source.getStore() == destination.getStore()) {
// source and destination MAY BE in the same store
// the potentially same store
Store store = source.getStore();
Scope sameScope = source.getScope();
// look for a registered scope that is below the scope to that
// the store is mapped
for(Enumeration e = scopes.elements(); e.hasMoreElements();) {
Scope scope = (Scope)e.nextElement();
if (scope.toString().startsWith(sameScope.toString())) { // (:-(
if (scopes.get(scope) != store) {
// we found an other store that is responsible to
// resources below the scope
return false;
}
}
// source and destination ARE in the same store
return true;
}
return false;
}
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Right. Is this legal in the first place? Does such a configuration work?
Is it sensible?
If it is maybe it would be easiest to simply disallow the use of
MacroStores in such scenarios?!
Oliver
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Did you mean something like this?
<scope match="/" store="s1">
<scope match="/a/deeper/path" store="s2">
copy /a to /some/collection
both /a and /some/collection are mapped to the same store
s1 but some descendants of the source are from are in store s2.
Thats strange by may happen.
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann schrieb:
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
How do I find out which stores are involved? Analysing what has
been configured in Domain.xml?
what about that?
Uri source, destination;
if (source.getStore() == destination.getStore()) {
// source and destination are in the same store
}
Glad I asked someone ;) My solution would have been crazy...
But wait: this will not work when successors of the Uris are in
different stores :(
??? can you give me an example?
No, seems this was just nonsense ...
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
