For most usage scenarios the webdav API is the better choice. It scales better and the API is cleaner.
-James On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 20:32 -0800, lixin chu wrote: > saw an earlier post in Sept. seems that using WebDAV > api is a better choice. no much performance loss, but > better APIs, more features, safer, scalable, etc. > > any suggestion ? > --- lixin chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > are there any examples of using the native API ? > > > > thanks > > li xin > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We > > finish. > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
