On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:59:40 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 14:31 +0000, Andy Bowes wrote: > > The long term goal for our portal is to be able to migrate to a JCR > > compliant repository but I reckon it will be nearly a year before the major > > CMS players introduce robust implementations of the JCR specification. Our > > aim is to allow our customers to select a CMS based on cost / performance > > and to be able to switch CMS repositories just by reconfiguring the > > application.
Have you seen signs that indicate major CMS players will finally implement the JCR? Just wondering... Anyway, I am afraid an exchange still will not be possible even when programming to the JCR. Certainly, it is nice to have something like an API people are familiar with, but - as you said - there are certain mandatory parts that are not adressed by the API. AFAIK this has been done on purpose and won't change. Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
