Hi Jun,

- The db-schema scripts don't define an index on that column.
- Possibly a change from varchar2(255) to varchar2(4000) will be sufficient for 
you
  (see latest changes also here -> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12926.html)
- Versioning and other things (possibly many users assigned to a role) create 
large entries in the column property_value  of the table PROPERTIES (another 
URL: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg11754.html)

If i remember right there were discussions about storing group-sets values in a 
more "relational" manner. So i am using the varchar2(4000) setting atm and not 
CLOB.  The mentioned (theoretical) indexing issues was the only thing that came 
to mind immediately. I didn't make thorough tests running with a CLOB, so i can 
share experiences there.

I am curious myself, if using a CLOB for that column would be the final 
solution for this issue.

Roman

Am Fr 19.11.2004 10:02, Gao Jun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:

> Hi Roman,
>  
> Thanks for your answer. I'd like to know is index on this column necessary?
> If I don't need to worry search for now, is there any other known issues 
> related to
> the difference of Oracle's varchar2 and CLOB type? 
>  
> regards,
>  
> Jun
> 
> Roman Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I thought about that too somewhen. Indexing the CLOB will be an issue. 
> Formally you need the "Context Option", which basically will mean that it 
> will be a "Domain Index" suitable for fulltext search.
> 
> If you try to index that type of column you get an ORA-02327 (cannot create 
> index ...).
> 
> The workaround was to alter the table and extend the column to varchar2(4000) 
> (this apparently didn't find the way into beta 2. I remember a hotfix a while 
> ago).
> 
> Good luck
> 
> Am Fr 19.11.2004 08:25, Gao Jun schrieb:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Has anybody tried to using Oracle's CLOB for properties table's 
> > property_value column,
> > instead of the original VARCHAR2(255)? We are trying to do this right now. 
> > Although
> > it can pass the basic test cases, we are still not sure whether this is a 
> > reliable solution.
> > Could anyone share your experience with us? Thanks.
> > 
> > regards,
> > 
> > Jun
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! ?Try it today! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>                       
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  The all-new My Yahoo! Â Get yours free!    




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to