Changes to core are both in 2.1 and head branch. They pass
informations about which children have been added / modified to the
store implementations. Additionally, in cvs head there is a store
implementation for MySQL.

Oliver 


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:33:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In detail 2.2 will have much more fain grained locks which will add to
> the
> > multi user scalability. Additionally, larger collections will be
> practical
> > at least with certain backend stores.
> 
> Oliver, what is the state of these enhancements? Is it already in the
> HEAD branch? If not, when will it be? Do these changes impact the 2.1
> store implementations?
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 23. November 2004 17:05
> To: Slide Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Slide usage questions
> 
> More generally I can say that in Slide 2.1 there are restrictions
> concerning the number of concurrent users and the practical size of
> collections. Both restrictions have been addressed in the latest Slide
> code that eventually will become 2.2.
> 
> In detail 2.2 will have much more fain grained locks which will add to
> the multi user scalability. Additionally, larger collections will be
> practical at least with certain backend stores.
> 
> However, very large collections are discouraged anyway when accessing
> data over WebDAV as encoding and decoding from/to XML of collection
> member information really will eat up quite some time. AFAIK there is no
> way to retrieve only a number of children of a collection with an
> ordinary PROPFIND, is there?
> 
> Bottom line: I *personally* would recommend Slide 2.1 for low to medium
> load and concurrency scenarios only.
> 
> Oliver
> 
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:51:10 -0800 (PST), Steve Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We're looking to use slide for a key project and if you have a few
> moments I would like to ask a couple of questions:
> >
> > o   In your experience (internal to your company or external) what are
> the largest number to concurrent user using Slide?
> >
> > o   Similarly, what are the largest collections (number of objects or
> documents etc) that are managed by slide?
> >
> > o   How responsive is end user performance?
> >
> > o   What is the up/down time (works fine with no problems 24 x 7, goes
> down once a week etc) for the product and how easy or hard is it to
> maintenance?
> >
> > o   What are some of the workflow options?
> >
> > o   What environments have you seen slide running in (like WebSphere
> with db2, TX  & file system for storage)
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >  Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to