Seems you did understand my reply;) Changes are both CVS head as well as 2.1 branch.
Oliver On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:18:13 -0800, Warwick Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't understand the reply :-) Do you mean that you recently > added the 4 param ctor to UserRoleImpl and that I can pick up the > change? Which branch is it in? I compared my version of this file > against 2.1 and head and didn't see any changes to UserRoleImpl. Or is > there something else I'm missing here? > > I added a 4 parameter ctor to UserRoleImpl myself and (just like the > others) it calls its super class (SubjectNode) equivalent and this seems > to work. > > Warwick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM > > To: Slide Users Mailing List > > Subject: Re: UserRoleImpl missing 4 param constructor? > > > > > > Previously, I used SubjectNode as the role and now > > UserRoleImpl has this ctor. > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:27:01 -0800, Warwick Burrows > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Up until now I have had the authentication/security > > features of Slide > > > disabled. Now that I have to come to play with making use of users > > > I'm having a problem after slide server restart with loading users > > > from the db. The users were created using the auto-create-mechanism > > > and were created in the object table with class name > > UserRoleImpl and > > > when > > > SecurityImpl.getPrincipal() tries to retrieve a user from > > the store it > > > is getting an exception when trying to construct a > > UserRoleImpl class > > > because the code in StandardrDBMSAdapter expects a 4 parameter > > > constructor which UserRoleImpl doesn't have. Its super class > > > (SubjectNode) does have a 4 parameter constructor. > > > > > > So how is it possible that auto-create-users has worked and that > > > UserRoleImpl structures could ever have been successfully > > constructed > > > when there is no 4 parameter constructor? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Warwick > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
