Hello,
From my experience with the bind store, the first DAV:parent child in a DAV:parent-set element is the 'real' or original resource. If a bind is created to this same resource, a second DAV:parent child is added, but no difference is made between them exists, witch is the justification of Reschke statement. That's even worse: if you erase the ‘original’, only the ‘bind’ resource is left, so it becames the ‘original’ resource :P
That's not "worse", that's the whole point of it.
In my project we solved this problem by making a propatch before making a bind of a resource, where we would store the original resource URI in the resource to be binded. Since the properties are shared by all binds, that means we can distinguish what is a bind and the original resource.
There is no "original" resource. Actually, there is only resource. The BIND mechanism is about mapping multiple URIs to the same resource, so the only question you could ask is "what is the binding under which the resource originally was created"?
Best regards, Julian
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
