I would not create another interface for this. A simple bean class
should probably suffice it, I think ...
Regards
Felix
Am Freitag, den 19.10.2007, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On 10/19/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So we would probably have:
> >
> > public class Sling {
> ...
> > public void include(String path) throws ServletException, IOException
> ...
>
> Yes, something like that.
>
> I wouldn't call the class "Sling" though, as it's not sling, it's only
> a poor lonesome helper class. But I'd call the variable that holds
> this in scripts "sling".
>
> > Would this be for scripting-only ?
>
> It doesn't have to, but as you mentioned it makes less sense in java
> code, where people are expected to know their J2EE stuff.
>
> That's why I called the interface SlingScriptHelpers in my initial
> suggestion: it's usually meant for scripting, but of course people can
> use it in java code if they want.
>
> -Bertrand
