On 10/26/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >... I'd put all of this inside the "sling.api" package instead of "sling"....
> ...I think the "api" in the package name is superfluous :) It's clear that > if the package is o.a.sling that this is the api.... If you see it in isolation, of course you're right. But if someone sees all the Sling code in the same tree (for example with merged javadocs from all Sling modules) you'd have something like that, not? core exceptions (*) helpers (*) jcr osgi params (*) See what I mean? The (*) packages are from the API, the others are from the implementations of the various modules. They're all mixed up now. But maybe I'm missing something.... -Bertrand
