Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all, > > The RequestPathInfo interface is currently defined to return empty > strings (or empty array for one method) if no extension, selectors, > suffix exists in the request URL. This makes checking for existence of > any of the parts somewhat complicated. On the other hand to build a > string, you just print the respective method result and don't worry for > null values. > > I would like to quickly poll on the list, what the general impression is > on the question: Should null or an empty instance (String, array) be > returned in the absence of the respective path part ? > > My opinion is: null should be returned. > I'm definitly +1 for null for strings, I'm not sure if that's the best thing for arrays though, there I would prefer an empty array - but if I'm the only one, null is fine as well.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
