Hi guys, I noticed that the resolution for scripts in microsling is based on the mime-type and not how I would have expected based on the extension. Personally, I think that this is somewhat confusing since the rest of the script resolution (selectors) is straight from the request url.
I think that the additional indirection to go through a mime-type table adds complexity (since it is yet another mechanism) and is questionable to begin with since somehow it seems to tie the response mime-type into the request behaviour for no apparent reason. I know of a lot of cases where the same response script offers responses in various (not limited) mime-types, based on what the user uploaded to the repository. Personally, I would rather just go for a straight, more direct extension-based resolution than engaging in the whole mimetype business. regards, david
