On Dec 4, 2007 11:21 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ...Do we really need suffixes?....
> ...OTOH how would you support creating a node /content/foo/bar below the > existing node /content/foo ? Would you require the POST (or whatever > method) method to extract the relative path "bar" from the request URI ?... You're right, suffixes are useful for POST requests, and we're using them already. And I just had a chat with David who mentioned using suffixes for GET requests, for example in case a file is uploaded as an nt:resource at /content/mypage/upload, and it is useful to have /content/mypage/upload/originalname.pdf as the download URL, so that downloaders get the right filename. That's two use-cases where suffixes are useful, thanks for clarifying that - that's enough for me to want to keep them, I just needed to have concrete cases. -Bertrand
