Hi, Am Freitag, den 07.12.2007, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Marcel Reutegger: > > Yes, the prefix is not stable - which has its pros and cons. But from an > > application point of view (which is what we have in case of using script > > paths), these prefixes should stay stable - Building an application > > adapting to prefix changes is close to impossible > > why is that? the application simply has to set prefix to uri mappings on its > session for the prefixes it uses.
Which is what we do and thus have "stable" prefixes, right ? > > - of course we could > > use the uri as the path element instead of prefix - but I am sure, this > > is not very user friendly ... > > my concern is just that this turns a prefix into a local name, which seems > wrong. This is kind of correct. On the other hand IIUIC namespacing is for ordering and collision prevention, which is what we also do here. > but on the other hand, how will ever change a prefix? Exactly. Regards Felix
