Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, adapters always (currently) rely on the functionality supported by > the concrete implementation. This is the case for both the > Resource.adaptTo() as well as for the proposed > ResourceResolver.adaptTo() method. > > Of course, we could conceive a more flexible approach as implemented in > Eclipse, where there is an Adaptable interface defining the adaptTo() > method and some functionality for implementing configurable adaptors > exist. Not sure, whether we this for Sling, though. > Yepp, I'm not sure, too :)
Ok, so we could start with the adaptTo approach and see where we get with it. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
