http://bitliquid.com/private/sling/Proposal-2-1.jpg
http://bitliquid.com/private/sling/Proposal-2-1.svg
Since, as of now, it seems that the preferred logo is the one based
upon the current one, so I worked on vectorising & improving it. As
suggested, I've switched both of the logos to the blue colour, & have
subsequently switched the colour of the µ to a red colour matching the
Apache feather. I also un-rounded the two corners, I think it gives
the logo a little more personality, and makes it a little less
'generic web 2.0'.
The variant on the bottom was made to address Bertrand Delacretaz's
concern about the S blending into the top Border. I prefer the other
version, but it's not all up to me… what does everyone else think
about this pair of logos?
On 15/01/2008, at 12:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:54 PM, Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...OK - the issue said to use the term microsling....
You're right - things are still very much in flux in a young project
like Sling, sorry about that.
... I've updated the logos
to use µsling in the logos, and to use the official feather in all
logos. Proposal 1-1 (original proposal also available here)..
Thanks (the URL is http://bitliquid.com/private/sling/proposal1-1.jpg)
I like the way you used the mu letter, apart from that my favorite
hasn't changed - see my previous mail in this thread. And, like Felix,
I think the Sling and µsling logos should be the same color.
-Bertrand
