Hi Betrand, Do we really need "spi" packages here ? This sounds like intrusive in the API and Commons bundle....
Regards Felix Am Freitag, den 18.01.2008, 13:15 +0000 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Author: bdelacretaz > Date: Fri Jan 18 05:15:17 2008 > New Revision: 613154 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=613154&view=rev > Log: > SLING-169 - adapt some Jackrabbit package names due to move to 1.4 > > Modified: > incubator/sling/trunk/jcr/jackrabbit-server/pom.xml > > Modified: incubator/sling/trunk/jcr/jackrabbit-server/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/sling/trunk/jcr/jackrabbit-server/pom.xml?rev=613154&r1=613153&r2=613154&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- incubator/sling/trunk/jcr/jackrabbit-server/pom.xml (original) > +++ incubator/sling/trunk/jcr/jackrabbit-server/pom.xml Fri Jan 18 05:15:17 > 2008 > @@ -131,15 +131,18 @@ > org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.*, > > EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.*, > - org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.derby.* > + org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.derby.*, > + > + <!-- needed since the move to Jackrabbit 1.4 --> > + org.apache.jackrabbit.spi.commons.conversion.*, > + org.apache.jackrabbit.spi.commons.namespace.*, > + org.apache.jackrabbit.spi.* > </Private-Package> > <Import-Package> > org.apache.sling.jcr.api, > > org.apache.jackrabbit, > - org.apache.jackrabbit.name, > org.apache.jackrabbit.util, > - org.apache.jackrabbit.util.name, > org.apache.jackrabbit.uuid, > org.apache.jackrabbit.value, > > >
