hi guys, i am still somewhat confused why we are looking into the whole escaping issue. was there an actual issue at hand?
so far i have not experienced any issue with the current "escaping" and i really would stay away from something like url escaping... i simply don't see a need. am i mistaken? btw: i am happy to remove the quotes from names that don't need the quotes. regards, david On 1/22/08, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahem. :) I kind of assumed that the "sling:resourceType" property was magic, > and anything inside it would something that could be rendered in a browser. > Maybe not. > > I think that one of the problems in learning Sling is that it seems to be > infinitely configurable, so that you can add renderers for things on the > fly, et.c. But if I say it this was; If there is some kind of basic type in > Sling for content to be consumed in a browser, then that could reasonably be > decalured to be of type urlencoded String. Would that be OK. > > Also, for my current project (Bunkai editor for Sling), I don't really need > the content int he json structure, I only need the hierarchical structure, > in array format already described, and some unique id/name that I can use > later, when a treenode (in Dojo) is sleected, to get the actual content. > > Cheers, > PS > > On Jan 22, 2008 12:07 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Jan 22, 2008 11:53 AM, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ...The 'meaning' of a property value is application domain specific > > anyway, so > > > I think we can choose any encoding type which is reasonably simple, as > > long > > > as it is documented clearly.... > > > > But how do you decide (in the general case, with the default JSON > > renderer) which properties to escape() and which to send out > > unescaped? > > > > And how do you tell the client (dont' say "configuration" please ;-) > > which ones are escaped? > > > > -Bertrand > > >
