Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
it's just not intuitive, why should one retrieve the resource resolver
from a resource and then pass in the very same resource again? this is
so not object oriented.
Hmm, I think directly the opposite :) It's the task of the resolver to
resolve the resources and not of a resource. The resource has no
knowledge how to resolve anything. Therefore I still think that the
cleaner solution is to always use the resource resolver for resolving.
But as I said in the first sentence in my last response :) I'm not
against these changes. If you all think that this is the right move,
well let's do it.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
