David Nuescheler wrote:

as a matter of fact i would like to see a "currentNode" variable
in all the scripting environments, so i don't have to deal with the
resource to begin with...

+1

Ok, we can still argue about the name though... :) I would call it just "node" as we already have "resource"

Carsten


--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to