On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 good idea. but would be ".es" a better extension?
Agree with .es -Bertrand
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Jav... Jukka Zitting
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Jav... David Nuescheler
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript files Felix Meschberger
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript files Bertrand Delacretaz
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript f... Tobias Bocanegra
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript files Jukka Zitting
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript files Lars Trieloff
- Re: How to I chmod -x on Javascript files Felix Meschberger
- Change server side JavaScript extension to ecma (was: ... Felix Meschberger
- Re: Change server side JavaScript extension to ec... Tobias Bocanegra
- Re: Change server side JavaScript extension t... Bertrand Delacretaz
- Re: Change server side JavaScript extensi... David Nuescheler
- Re: Change server side JavaScript ext... Felix Meschberger
- Re: Change server side JavaScrip... Bertrand Delacretaz
- Support for direct script addressing (was: How to I ch... Felix Meschberger
- Re: Support for direct script addressing (was: Ho... Bertrand Delacretaz
- Re: Support for direct script addressing (was: Ho... Tobias Bocanegra
- Re: Support for direct script addressing (was: Ho... Lars Trieloff
- Re: Support for direct script addressing (was... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Support for direct script addressing (was... Lars Trieloff
- Re: Support for direct script addressing ... Felix Meschberger
