On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... How about defining a formal remote protocol for JCR instead? ...

Doesn't have to be "instead" IMHO, that sounds like a totally
different project, isn't it?

> ...having a defined, formal
>  protocol to interact with a JCR repository would be ideal. I'm
>  thinking something similar to webdav but more appropriate for JCR
>  repositories....

Do you mean formalizing/clarifying what Sling does with ujax, etc?

Or rather defining a new protocol, REST-based I assume?

If you're thinking about the latter, I'm not sure if it's in scope for
Sling, that might be more a Jackrabbit project, IMHO.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to