On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Vidar Ramdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ... Errr, I'm not too enthusiastic about mod_proxy :)
>  As mod_proxy would have to live outside Sling, it would not be able to
>  intercept sling.include requests.
>  So that a request from a browser to http://www.domain.com/path would
>  yield a different result than sling.include("/path")....

Good point - I'm starting to be convinced ;-)

-Bertrand

Reply via email to