> Ah, now I remember the reason for docroot .... In this case, I would NOT > put sling.js into docroot. IMHO it is not required to access this > as /sling.js i thought so ;) from a "user" perspective though it is hard to explain and justify a "funky" url. i think this is very similar to the webdav url.
i think the "simplest" case needs to be very simple and i definitely see value in going out of our way to make the first steps as simple as possible... regards, david
