that's what david mentioned earlier: > i think it may well be worth the effort of looking into finding out what we > can do around the gplv3 licensing of extjs.
-- toby On 4/22/08, Craig L. Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Slightly unrelated, but still relevant; I thought Apache didn't allow > > GPL'd code in their projects. Has that changed with the GPL version 3? > > > > Good point, I wasn't even aware that ext was GPL, but I just checked and > so it is. It would probably have to be a separately distributed project > if that was the way someone went. > > > > -- > > > Torgeir Veimo > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >
