Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2008, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
> Felix Meschberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2008, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...should we support the trailing slash case at all ? Maybe it
> >>> would be a good thing for some users ?...
> >> POSTing to foo/ to create something under foo is quite usual, so we
> >> might want to keep it in addition to POSTing to foo/* as explained in
> >> my previous message.
> >
> > In light of your explanation: +1
> >
> What about making Bertrand's use case more specific? Which means, we
> support posting to "/" (like everyone does :) ) and to
> /*.{selector.extension}, so posting to /* is not allowed.
Implementation-wise it is probably simpler to silently also accept /* -
but we might not document this or we might document but suggest to just
use /. Consistency-wise, I think we should accept /* if we
accept /*[.selector][.extension].
Regards
Felix
