So why is it defined as major release(just looking at the version number) without being a final release? Wouldn't it be the better way to define Milestone releases like RC1 - RCx?
Dominik On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Dominik Süß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > ...While I do not have the time right now I would really like to define > (or at > > least help to define) a basic but obligatory set of documents for the > final > > 2.0.0 release.... > > Although the version number is 2.0.0 (or whatever that is), what we're > talking about for next week is in no way a "final" release, I think > that's where our viewpoints differ: we're definitely shooting for a > "release early, release often" way of working here. > > So while I agree that docs are required for a "final" release, we're > more talking about an "initial" release ;-) > > -Bertrand >
