> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Klimetschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Dojo Bundles > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Craig L. Ching > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, and they are sign of a quick dojo hack ;-) > >> > > Quick? No, dojo has been like that forever. Hack? Maybe. > > I meant the missing dojo.require should have been in the > (custom) code. Dojo's require system is great! > Ah, ok, I apologize for misunderstanding!
> > Anyway, don't mean to be argumentative, but I actually really like > > dojo's require system. Once you get used to it, it's not so bad > > tracking down these sorts of problems. Indeed, once you understand > > it, it rarely comes up because you code against having > these sorts of > > problems by nature. > > I like the require system, too, since it allows for different > deployments of the library code: as single, original js files > for debugging, as bundles for sub-modules including several > js files in one and as a big all-in-one package of everything > you need for your page. That is really helpful in a world of > > 10.000 lines of client-side javascript... > Yeah, exactly. > Alex > > -- > Alexander Klimetschek > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cheers, Craig
