Hi, On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This time we are releasing a lot of artifacts - after this first release > we will release one or two artifacts at a time in different intervals. As > always the initial release is the hardest one. > > Although we release a set of artifacts, this is not an all-or-nothing vote! > If one (or more) artifacts for whatever reason do not meet the release > criterias, we still can/should release the remaining "good" artifacts. So > hopefully we can release at least one to decrease the count :) (As we have > some dependencies between the arifacts, turning down one artifact might > prevent us from releasing others of course). > > Anyway, please indicate clearly for which artifacts you vote and with which > artifacts you have problems!
Whoa, you are running almost 50 release votes in parallel?!? I'm all for modularity, but isn't this a bit extreme? What's wrong with just tagging the entire trunk and having the release candidate be the packaged svn export of that tag? BR, Jukka Zitting
