Hi,

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am struggling to understand what is going on here.  LICENSE and NOTICE
> refer to the copyrightable material in *this* package.  Surely we don't
> distribute Derby and Xerces in *this* package, do we?  Jetty?  WTF?

We do. The tricky thing with Maven is that even though the source
release doesn't contain the dependencies, the build result still ends
up containing them. Thus we have things like the Sling app and Sling
webapp binaries that come with all the dependencies inside them.

Also, to make matters even more interesting, AFAIK the plan is to also
make each individual bundle artifact (some with, some without included
dependencies) available in the Maven repository, so we should have
proper NOTICEs also for those bits.

I raised the generic issue on legal-discuss@ (see [1]) to gather
feedback on how to best handle that complexity.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/bttmkavpicxxg7gl

PS. Of course, we could do just a source release to get started... :-)

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Reply via email to