[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605503#action_12605503
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-540:
-----------------------------------------
The current state is as follows:
- We download the source distro at compile time and include this in the bundle
- The SVN repository does not contain any stuff from dojotoolkit.org
So, we might be able to create a source distro of the dojo bundle, but given
the license incertainties, it might be wiser to decide to never do a binary --
convenience that is -- distro of this (and some other bundles).
> Clarify extensions/dojo licensing
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-540
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
> Priority: Minor
>
> The extensions/dojo component comes with the LICENSE_dojo file (which should
> be merged to LICENSE) and a "The Dojo Foundation" notice, but I'm not sure if
> that covers everything included.
> The LICENSE_dojo mentions: "Some modules may not be the copyright of the Dojo
> Foundation. These modules contain explicit declarations of copyright in both
> the LICENSE files in the directories in which they reside and in the code
> itself. No external contributions are allowed under licenses which are
> fundamentally incompatible with the AFL or BSD licenses that Dojo is
> distributed under", so there shouldn't be any surprises but we may need to
> add something like a generic "see the individual files for applicable
> copyright and license information" clause to our LICENSE and NOTICE files.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
