On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a quick question: Why don't you set your resource type to be my/foobar > or even my:foobar ? > > So you are at > > /libs/my/foobar > /libs/my/type
Because the namespace prefix "my" is a very generic one (it is "cq" ;-)), but the "myapp" stuff is much more specific. I should have better named the example "mylib", since I am in the /lib folder, which gets typically more oriented towards smaller library parts than entire applications. These smaller parts are more fine-granular than the namespace, so it unfortunately doesn't fit. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
