Josh if you could you follow up on the thread when you have got your
answer, this a common request, be nice to get a fully qualified
response for the question!

Many Thanks,

Paul

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> This sounds like a question for hardcore search guys. Maybe you might
> have more luck asking this question on one of the Jackrabbit lists ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Joshua Oransky schrieb:
>> Ok,
>>
>>     Basically what I need is the reverse of what index aggregating does
>> in JCR. I need to aggregate content from PARENT nodes onto my child
>> nodes, so that the child is searched as if it has all the content of the
>> whole hierarchy.
>>
>>     Is this possible, and how do I do it?
>>
>>     -Josh
>>
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Josh,
>>>
>>> something like
>>>
>>> //california//element(*, my:House)
>>>
>>> where my:House is the node type identifying houses could do the trick.
>>> Or if you have a fixed hierarchy (houses are two levels under the
>>> state) and no specific node type for houses, this would work:
>>>
>>> //california/*/*
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Joshua Oransky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>       I have a hierarchy that is utilizing inheritance; that is, my app
>>>> consolidates all information on an entire hierarchy on a single node.
>>>>
>>>>       This means that information is spread across the hierarchy, but I
>>>> want my searches to come up with only the end node...
>>>>
>>>>       For example, take this hierarchy:
>>>>
>>>> /country
>>>>       /state
>>>>               /city
>>>>                       /house
>>>>
>>>>       I want my searches to only return house nodes, but the house node
>>>> doesn't contain information about the city, state, or country. Is
>>>> there a
>>>> way to collapse the hierarchy for searches, so that a search for, say,
>>>> "California" returns all the houses in California, not the California
>>>> node?
>>>>
>>>>       Thanks! -Josh
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexander Klimetschek
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to